Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Sullivan
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1992No. 91-1064PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
Dr. William E. Anderson, Jr., appeals the dismissal of his claim to force the government to maintain his Medicare reimbursement eligibility during the pendency of his exclusion appeal. The district court1 dismissed the claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Since we find that Anderson’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies robs this court of subject matter jurisdiction and his claim for mandamus is moot, we affirm.
I
Anderson practiced medicine in Iowa, receiving reimbursement for services provided under Medicare. On June 9, 1988, the Iowa Foundation for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cassim v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Koerpel v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Anderson v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- In Home Health, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Donna Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- One Thousand Friends of Iowa v. MinetaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2002
- In Re 2000 Sugar Beet Crop Insurance LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.