Antonellis v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Judge:
In this military pay case, Plaintiff James Antonellis, an officer of the United States Navy Reserve, alleges that he is entitled to back pay under the Military Pay Act, 37 U.S.C. § 206 (2006), because the Navy Reserve improperly failed to assign him a Selected Reserve pay billet. Between 2009 and 2011, he applied to 69 Selected Reserve pay billets, but he was not selected for one. Consequently, he remained on an unpaid billet. He alleges that the Navy Reserve failed to follow its own procedures in selecting officers, which resulted in his non-selection. Plaintiff alleges…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Antonellis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Boyce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
- Exnicios v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Fuentes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Ignatius M. Tee, Jr. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.