Argabrite v. Argabrite
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing counsel fees, costs and alimony to the wife pending her appeal. Bernard J. Flood, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant for a divorce on the ground of cruelty. The trial court granted to the plaintiff a decree; thereafter the defendant made a motion in the trial court that the plaintiff be directed to pay her moneys for her support pending an appeal, moneys for her expenses on appeal, and moneys to employ an attorney to present her appeal. The trial court refused to make an order and from the order of the trial court so refusing to make such order for maintenance, etc., the defendant has appealed. The defendant served a written notice of the time and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stewart v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Coleman v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Bruce v. BruceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings, Etc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
- Clark v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Perry v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Boyle v. Philadelphia Police Widows' Pension Fund Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Cesena v. CesenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.