Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Coleman

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1913No. Civ. No. 1263PublishedCited by 23 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from orders refusing leave to file notice of new trial and. denying alimony and costs. William P. Lawlor, Judge. . The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying a divorce to plaintiff, and granting a divorce to defendant on his eross-complaint. There is also an appeal from the two orders made by the court after the entry of the interlocutory decree of divorce, the first order being one denying plaintiff permission to file notice of intention to move for a new trial after the time for the filing of such notice.had expired, which relief was sought under the terms of section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure; and the second order being one denying plaintiff alimony, costs, or counsel fees pending appeal.

It is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dutcher v. DutcherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Adams v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Union Collection Co. v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Smith v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Smith v. LombardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Norris v. NorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Brinson v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  4. Sorrels v. SorrelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API