Bruce v. Bruce
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Kings County, made after an interlocutory judgment in an action for a divorce, awarding alimony to the wife. John G. Covert, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The plaintiff commenced this action to obtain
a divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. The defendant having answered, the cause was tried, and the court made its interlocutory decree which, after reciting that findings had been waived, adjudged that plaintiff was entitled to a divorce. The decree further adjudged that the plaintiff be awarded permanent alimony in the sum of $4,500, and that to secure this sum, she have a lien on the homestead of the parties, said homestead being assigned to the defendant.
This interlocutory decree was rendered on April 20, 1910. The plaintiff was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Howell v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Gay v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Luco v. De ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bohnert v. BohnertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Grannis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Ex Parte AppersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- McCahan v. McCahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Snow v. DuxstadWyoming Supreme Court · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.