Legal Opinion

Cesena v. Cesena

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 1951No. Civ. 14530, 14554PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, P. J. —

— The plaintiff in an action for a divorce brings two appeals — the first from an order refusing to vacate the final decree and to hold the defendant in contempt of court for an alleged failure to comply with the terms of the interlocutory decree, and denying plaintiff counsel fees in connection with the hearing of the order to show cause; the second from an order denying counsel fees to plaintiff for prosecuting such appeal. The only debatable question raised is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying plaintiff counsel fees in relation to the hearing on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Kellett v. KellettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Argabrite v. ArgabriteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Perry v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Thomas v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McMahan v. McMahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Walker v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Butler v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API