Legal Opinion

In rre Giaquinto

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 28, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application by Giorgio Giaquinto for naturalization.

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, District Judge.

Giaquinto is an applicant for naturalization, and on final hearing one of his witnesses did not appear. He desires to substitute a witness, and the question is whether it will be necessary to post the name, of the substituted witness for a period of 90 days, or whether said substituted witness may be summoned and examined without the prerequisite of posting.

The applicable sections of the act of June 29, 1906, are as follows:

“The petition shall also be verified by the affidavits of at least two credible witnesses, who are citizens of the United States, and who shall state…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re O'DeaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908
  2. United States v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1910
  3. In re SchatzDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1908
  4. United States v. OjalaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  5. In re NeugebauerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re VasicekDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API