Legal Opinion

United States v. Ojala

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 11, 1910No. 3,310PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. • ■ Petition by James Ojala for naturalization as a citizen of the United States. From a decree in favor of the petitioner, the United States brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

This is a writ of error prosecuted by the United States to secure a review of an order of the Circuit Court admitting James Ojala to citizenship.

Section 4 of the act entitled “An act to establish a Bureau of Immigration and Naturalization, and to provide for a uniform rule for the naturalization of aliens throughout the United States,” approved June 29, 1906 (34 Stat. 596, c. 3592 [U. S._Comp. St. Supp. 1909, p. 477]), requires an applicant for citizenship to file, with the clerk of some court having jurisdiction over the subject of naturalization, a petition in writing,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re O'DeaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908
  2. In re SchatzDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tutun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. LenoreDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1913
  3. In re HartmanDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1916
  4. In rre GiaquintoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916
  5. Marx v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API