Legal Opinion
In re Vasicek
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided March 12, 1921PublishedCited by 9 opinions
In the matter of the petition for naturalization of Frantisek Vasicek.
1Opinion of the Court
DYER, District Judge.
The candidate, Frantisek Vasicek, during the final hearing on his petition for naturalization, testified that he did not know the meaning of the words “anarchy” or “polygamy.” Thereupon the government prayed the denial of his application. Pertinent portions of the petition filed in this cause by said candidate follow:
“I ¿m not a disbeliever in or opposed to organized government or a member of or affiliated with any organization or body of persons teaching disbelief in or opposed to organized government. I am not a polygamist nor a believer of polygamy.”
The fourth…
2Cases cited147 opinions
- Luria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Johannessen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. GinsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Holmgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- MacKenzie v. HareSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Molsen v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. DickDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1923
- In re NyboDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1929
- In re VassallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- In re ViloriaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.