Legal Opinion
Colonial Surety Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 14, 2013No. 10-820 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment; Duties of the Government as Stakeholder; Equitable Subrogation; Breach of Contract
OPINION
HEWITT, Chief Judge
Colonial Surety Company (Colonial or plaintiff) was the surety for DME Construction Associates (DME or third-party defendant) on a construction contract for roof replacement with the Department of the Navy (the Navy, defendant or the government) at the Naval Support Activity in Mechanics-burg, Pennsylvania. See Am, Compl., Docket Number (Dkt. No.) 11, ¶ l.1 As a condition *627of the contract, and in accordance with section 3 13 1(b) of the Miller Act,…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dwyer v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania (In re Pihl, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- In Re: LTC Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020