Legal Opinion

Elizabeth W. v. State of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 16, 2012No. 2 CA-SA 2012-0060PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this special action, Elizabeth W. challenges the respondent judge’s order that she undergo urinalysis drug testing. Elizabeth also challenges the respondent’s subsequent refusal to destroy the test results and the sample obtained. We accept jurisdiction and grant relief.

¶ 2 In March 2011, the superior court ordered Elizabeth to undergo involuntary mental health treatment after finding she was a danger to herself and others and was persistently or acutely disabled. The court ordered a year of combined inpatient and outpatient treatment, appointing the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Romley v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. Potter v. VanderpoolCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Fenton v. HowardArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. Romley v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Campbell v. ThurmanArizona Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Butler v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API