Legal Opinion
Carlson v. Independent School District No. 283
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 13, 1985No. C9-84-2077PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
This appeal is from an order dismissing actions filed against numerous school districts by female teachers employed by those school districts. The teachers claimed their employers discriminated against them by denying use of sick pay for pregnancy and child-birth related disability during maternity leaves taken be tween 1975 and 1978. The basis for the trial court’s partial summary judgment was its determination that a timely charge filed under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) was a jurisdictional prerequisite to suit in Minnesota courts. Minn.Stat. § 363.06, subd.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Danz v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Chevalier v. Baird Savings Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Appleton Electric Company v. Graves Truck Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Staub v. Eastman Kodak Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Carlson v. Independent School District No. 623Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Christensen v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Khalifa v. Russell Dieter Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988