Hawkins v. Alabama Department of Corrections
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1ConcurrenceJoiner, Judge
I concur that the judgment in this matter is due to be affirmed. I disagree, however, with the rationale of the majority-
Antonio Hawkins, an inmate in the custody of the Alabama Department of Corrections (“the Department”), was found guilty of violating “rule number 91 [,] specifically [cjonspiracy to commit a violation of department or institutional rules,” and received 45 days of disciplinary segregation and lost visitation, phone, and store privileges for 90 days. (C. 11, 13.) Hawkins filed in the Montgomery Circuit Court a petition for a writ of certiorari arguing that the decision of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Broward v. Jacksonville Medical CenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Headley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- Austin v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Ex Parte ShabazzSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.