Legal Opinion

Headley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 19, 1998No. CR-96-2469PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Randall Headley, appeals from the summary denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The hearing officer found the appellant guilty of rule violation 64 in Annex A to the Alabama Department of Corrections Admin. Reg. No. 403, possession of contraband, specifically marijuana. The appellant was punished through loss of three months' good time and the loss of 30 days of canteen, visitation, and telephone privileges. The appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence that he was guilty of rule violation 64.

Because this case involves the loss of good time credit,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ex Parte HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. J.M.A. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  3. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  4. Siercks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  5. Wallace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API