Austin v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
During a prison disciplinary proceeding, the appellant, Ildefonso Austin, an inmate incarcerated at St. Clair Correctional Facility, was found guilty of intentionally creating a security, safety, or health hazard, a violation of Rule # 62, Regulation # 403. He was sanctioned with placement in disciplinary segregation for 15 days and the loss of visitation, telephone, and store privileges for 45 days. The appellant filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ellard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Ex Parte EllardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Swicegood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ex Parte ShabazzSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Writesman v. Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Andrews v. Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016
- Hawkins v. Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013
- Pardue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.