Legal Opinion

Austin v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 27, 2007No. CR-06-0505PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

During a prison disciplinary proceeding, the appellant, Ildefonso Austin, an inmate incarcerated at St. Clair Correctional Facility, was found guilty of intentionally creating a security, safety, or health hazard, a violation of Rule # 62, Regulation # 403. He was sanctioned with placement in disciplinary segregation for 15 days and the loss of visitation, telephone, and store privileges for 45 days. The appellant filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Ellard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Ex Parte EllardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Swicegood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ShabazzSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Writesman v. Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  3. Andrews v. Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  4. Hawkins v. Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  5. Pardue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API