Legal Opinion

Becker v. Becker

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1972No. 286PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The defendants’ first ground for demurrer was that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to state a cause of action. The hearing on the demurrer in the trial court and the argument here indicate that the defendants were objecting primarily to the plaintiff’s capacity to bring a stockholder’s derivative action. The principal thrust of the demurrer was not for failure to state a cause of action.

Sec. 263.09, Stats., provides that, where the objection is grounded on sec. 263.06 (2), lack of capacity to sue, the specific defect must be stated. This the defendants failed to do, and their…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schneck v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Gauger v. HintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Wesolowski v. EricksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Town of Greenfield v. Village of West MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Madler v. MatzenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lister v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Liddy v. LamoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. State Ex Rel. First National Bank of Wisconsin Rapids v. M & I Peoples Bank of ColomaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Gorski v. GorskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Shelstad v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API