Legal Opinion

Granner v. Fairview Center

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 16, 1997No. 95-01626; CA A91875PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding SAIF’s denial of her claim for compensation. The issue is whether SAIF is precluded from denying her claim for her current condition due to its earlier acceptance of her on-the-job injury. We review for substantial evidence and errors of law, ORS 183.482(7) and (8); ORS 656.298(6), and affirm.

Claimant has a congenital bilateral knock knee 1 deformity. Prior to 1990, she suffered recurrent right knee patellar dislocations, three of which required a physician to relocate the patella. In October 1990, claimant slipped…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. PiwowarOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sperry, Inc. v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Ledbetter v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Columbia Forest Products v. WoolnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Hill v. QwestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Roseburg Forest Products v. ClemonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Cloud v. Klamath County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API