Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Ponda
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 24, 2008No. 37A04-0712-CV-689PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRONE, Judge.
Nick Peterson and Patricia Peterson (collectively, “the Petersons”) appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
The facts most favorable to Robert and Karen Ponda (collectively, “the Pondas”) as the nonmoving parties are as follows. The Petersons, a married couple, own a residential property on U.S. Highway 231 in Rensselaer. In July 2002, the Peter-sons began supervising construction of their new home on this property. They lived in a mobile home on the property and served as general contractors on the home-building project.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robinson v. KinnickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Chi Yun Ho v. FryeIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Mishler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Cox v. Stoughton Trailers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Daisy v. RoachIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Buddy & Pals III, Inc., Buddy & Pals II, Inc., Buddy & Pals Inc., Timothy Heidbreder, and William Frank Bailey, Jr. v. Christopher FalaschettiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Carson v. E.On Climate & Renewables, North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2015
- Cavanaugh's Sports Bar & Eatery, Ltd. v. Eric PorterfieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- J.C. Penney Co. v. Simon Property Group, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Al Seng v. Indiana-American Water Co., Inc. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.