Legal Opinion

Smith v. Baxter

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 2003No. 87S05-0209-CV-468PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

A jury verdict awarded plaintiff Mark Baxter $600,000 in damages after finding him 40% at fault and finding defendants John and Rufus Smith 60% at fault with regard to Baxter's fall from a ladder on the Smiths' farm. The defendants appealed, raising a single issue: whether the trial court erred in denying their motion for judgment on the evidence. The Court of Appeals reversed in a memorandum decision. We granted transfer, 783 N.E.2d 695 (Ind.2002) (table), and now affirm the trial court.

The standard of review for a challenge to a ruling on a motion for judgment on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Douglass v. IrvinIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bals v. VerduzcoIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Heck v. RobeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Get-N-Go, Inc. v. MarkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Kirchoff v. SelbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Pfenning v. LinemanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Cavens v. ZaberdacIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. James C. Purcell v. Old National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Christmas v. Kindred Nursing Centers Ltd. PartnershipIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Andrew Bourne v. Marty Gilman, Incorporated, Doing Business as Gilman GearCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API