Legal Opinion

Dilworth v. Lauritzen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1967No. 10672PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Justice:

The plaintiff and the defendant signed a contract whereby plaintiff was given the right as a distributor of Solaray products in Salt Lake City, Utah, and as such distributor he would have the right to appoint dealers within his territory. So long as plaintiff lived up to the terms of the contract, the defendant agreed not to appoint another competing distributor.

The plaintiff would be permitted to sell a certain geographical part of Salt Lake City to a dealer for a price to be agreed upon, and thereafter the dealer could sell the products in his territory but would be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pace v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hecht v. MetzlerUtah Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Ogden Livestock Shows, Inc. v. RiceUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Seeley v. HoustonUtah Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dugan v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Lamb v. BangartUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Brown v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  4. Turner v. General Adjustment Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  5. Long v. StutesmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API