Legal Opinion

Turner v. General Adjustment Bureau, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 22, 1992No. Case 910587-CAPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARFF, Judge:

Defendants, General Adjustment Bureau, Inc. (GAB), Inteldex Corporation, d/b/a Inteltech Services (Inteltech), and Oak Norton (Norton) appeal the trial court’s judgment notwithstanding the verdict (j.n.o.v.) in favor of plaintiff, Jackie Turner (Turner), , and the punitive damages award. Turner cross appeals, asserting that the trial court erred (1) by refusing to instruct the jury that emotional distress damages are recoverable in a cause of action for fraud, (2) by admitting evidence concerning Turner’s past drug use and psychological history, and (3) by refusing, after…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Trimble v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Ellis v. CrockettHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Pace v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Zanakis-Pico v. Cutter Dodge, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. CoseyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  5. Stien v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API