Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1937No. L. A. No. 16310PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding on behalf of the City of Los Angeles to have reviewed an order of the Industrial Accident Commission awarding compensation.

In 1935 the City of Los Angeles became co-sponsor of a Federal Works Progress Administration project whereby roads and firebreaks were to be constructed in the Santa Monica mountains to facilitate the moving of vehicles and fire extinguishing apparatus into this area, with a view to minimizing the hazard of brush fires in that locality. Under the plans for the project the federal government advanced about ninety-four per cent of the moneys…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoover v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  2. Shelton v. City of GreenevilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Todaro v. City of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. County of San Bernardino v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Board of Education v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McFarland v. Dixie MacHinery & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Soulek v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  3. City of Waco v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Dempster Mill Mfg. Co. v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Rok v. LeggDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API