Legal Opinion

Soulek v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1941No. 31002PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Meyer, District Judge.

This is an action for damages for personal injury. Plaintiff had judgment against each defendant in the amount of $4,000. Both appealed.

The petition alleges that the city of Omaha and the Works Progress Administration were engaged as joint adventurers in the construction of a fire barn for said city and in the extension and repair of the city garage; that on the morning of February 2, 1939, the defendant Dunn, a timekeeper of said administration, was negligently driving from one of said projects to the other in his employment on said works when he collided with an…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Holcomb v. LorinoTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Keiswetter v. RubensteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Rosenstrom v. North Bend Stage LineWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Carboneau v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Jessup v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1926

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Peterson v. MasseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Bowman v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  3. Dunn v. HembergerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Fangmeyer v. ReinwaldNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Kleinknecht v. McNultyNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API