Legal Opinion

Sierra Club v. California Coastal Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1993No. D017570PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, J.

In this case we are confronted with the conflicting interests of fish and fowl at Batiquitos Lagoon. We find the California Coastal Act gives the Coastal Commission the power to resolve this conflict and that the commission acted properly in doing so.

Factual and Procedural History

1. Batiquitos Lagoon

The factual setting which gives rise to this appeal was summarized in the record by the California Coastal Conservancy (Conservancy): “Batiquitos Lagoon is one of a series of six lagoons on the northern coast of San Diego County. It lies at the southern edge of the City of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. McMillan v. American General Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Sierra Club v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Long Beach Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Long Beach Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Environmental Protection Information Center v. California Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Center v. County of StanislausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Bolsa Chica Land Trust v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. La Costa Beach Homeowners' Ass'n v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Eden Hospital District v. BelshéCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API