Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Proposals D & H

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1983No. 70862, (Calendar No. 19)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

417 Mich. 409 (1983)

339 N.W.2d 848

In re PROPOSALS D & H

MICHIGAN STATE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

v.

STATE OF MICHIGAN

Docket No. 70862, (Calendar No. 19).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued April 7, 1983.

Decided October 17, 1983.

Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone (by John D. Pirich and Brian A. Kaser) for the plaintiffs.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Louis J. Caruso, Solicitor General, and Michael J. Hodge and Gary P. Gordon, Assistants Attorney General, for the defendants.

Amici Curiae:

Loomis, Ewert, Ederer, Parsley, Davis & Gotting (by George W. Loomis, Lawrence J. Gagnon, Harvey J. Messing, and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chisholm v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1793
  2. Chaney v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. In Re Certified QuestionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Karl v. Bryant Air Conditioning Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. National Pride at Work, Inc v. GovernorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Reynolds v. Bureau of State LotteryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Ass'n of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Abate v. PscMichigan Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API