National Pride at Work, Inc v. Governor
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWilder, J.
Intervening defendant Attorney General Michael Cox (AG) appeals as of right the Ingham Circuit Court’s order granting summary disposition under MCR 2.116(0(10) to plaintiffs National Fride at Work, Inc., which is a nonprofit constituency group of the AFL-CIO, 1 and various public employees and their respective same-sex domestic partners. In this appeal, the AG challenges the trial court’s declaratory ruling that the marriage amendment, article 1, § 25 of the Michigan Constitution, 2 does not preclude public employers from extending benefits to domestic partners of the same sex. We reverse.
i
We…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Chisholm v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1793
- Traverse City School Dist. v. Atty. Gen.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- MacK v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- National Pride at Work, Inc v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Rohde v. Ann Arbor Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Bassett v. SnyderDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- Godfrey v. SpanoNew York Supreme Court · 2007
- Leskovar v. NickelsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.