Rush v. Blanchard
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Toal, Justice:
The issues raised in this appeal and cross appeal are: (1) did the trial court err in refusing to grant a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) motion based on the plaintiffs failure to prove cause in fact, (2) did the trial court err in granting a new trial nisi remittitur rather than a new trial absolute, (3) can plaintiffs cross appeal a remittitur that they have accepted, and (4) did the trial court err in granting a new trial nisi remittitur.
FACTS
The plaintiffs in this action are Mr. and Ms. Rush and their minor son, Antoine. They brought this action alleging that Dr.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Graham v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Bramlette Ex Rel. Estate of Bramlette v. Charter-Medical-ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Plesko v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Morrison v. LoweSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Hall v. Northwestern R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Welch v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Vinson v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Small v. Pioneer MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Jackson v. SpeedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Cock-N-Bull Steak House, Inc. v. Generali InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.