Legal Opinion

Rush v. Blanchard

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 1, 1993No. 23794PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

The issues raised in this appeal and cross appeal are: (1) did the trial court err in refusing to grant a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) motion based on the plaintiffs failure to prove cause in fact, (2) did the trial court err in granting a new trial nisi remittitur rather than a new trial absolute, (3) can plaintiffs cross appeal a remittitur that they have accepted, and (4) did the trial court err in granting a new trial nisi remittitur.

FACTS

The plaintiffs in this action are Mr. and Ms. Rush and their minor son, Antoine. They brought this action alleging that Dr.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Graham v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Bramlette Ex Rel. Estate of Bramlette v. Charter-Medical-ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Plesko v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Morrison v. LoweSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Hall v. Northwestern R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Welch v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Vinson v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Small v. Pioneer MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Jackson v. SpeedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Cock-N-Bull Steak House, Inc. v. Generali InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API