Legal Opinion

Hall v. Northwestern R. R.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 16, 1908No. 7056PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Before Prince, J., Kershaw, spring term, 1907. Action 'by W. J. Hall against Northwestern Railroad Company of South ■Carolina. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Messrs.

Read the full summary

Before Prince, J., Kershaw, spring term, 1907. Action 'by W. J. Hall against Northwestern Railroad Company of South ■Carolina. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Messrs. Lee & Moise cite: As to assumption of risks: 77 S. C., 328; 184 N. Y., 148; Gadsden v. Catawba Power Co.; 78 S. C., 374, 472; 72 S. C„ 389; 16 S. C., 203; 44 S. C., 315; 55 S. C., 483; 58 S. C., 491; 54 S, C., 553; 69 S. C., 480; 74 S. C., 489; 72 S. C„ 237, 264. If plaintiff assumed a risk, with knowledge of the same, he cannot recover: 61 S. €., 478; 66 S. C„ 211, 302. New trial should be granted where the jwry…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The plaintiff, a freight conductor on the defendant’s railroad, went between- two freight cars for the purpose of coupling* them, was caught between the buffers and received personal injuries. On the allegation that his injuries were due to the negligence of the defendant railroad company, a verdict of fifteen thousand dollars was recovered. The Circuit Judge refused a motion for nonsuit, but granted a conditional order for a new trial. The defendant’s counsel, by their exceptions, submit that the motion for nonsuit should have been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Kennon v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Schultz v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Gardner v. TatumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Green v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Panama R. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  2. Rush v. BlanchardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Gwathmey v. Foor Hotel CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  4. Ford v. A. A. A. Highway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  5. South Carolina State Highway Department v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API