State v. Bement
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
*717**762This appeal requires us to consider when an out-of-court statement reflecting a declarant's state of mind is hearsay and, if so, when the statement falls within a hearsay exception. During a criminal trial, the court admitted some email statements written by the victim, but excluded others as hearsay. The Court of Appeals reversed, concluding that the excluded email statements were either not hearsay or were hearsay that fell within an exception to the hearsay rule for statements offered to prove the declarant's state of mind. For the reasons below, we affirm the decision of the Court of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. MayfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- United States v. Leon A. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Joseph Christopher FontenotCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- State v. MarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. SperouOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. BlackOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. EdmondsOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. BowmanOregon Supreme Court · 2025
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.