Legal Opinion

Orrell v. City of Hot Springs

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 14, 1992No. 92-254PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

In this case the constitutionality of an ordinance of the City of Hot Springs has been challenged as being in violation of the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of speech. The ordinance regulates “sexually oriented businesses” in Hot Springs by setting qualifications for licensing and assuring geographic disbursement within the City. The appellant, Jessie Orrell, who operates businesses which would require licenses pursuant to the ordinance, argued the ordinance (1) was unconstitutional because it did not guarantee a speedy determination of eligibility and (2)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Walnut Properties, Inc. v. City of WhittierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Alexander v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT GAZZETTE v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Helena Daily World v. SimesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Helena Daily World v. SimesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API