Legal Opinion

ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT GAZZETTE v. Zimmerman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 29, 2000No. 00-641PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. Brown, Justice.

The petitioners, Arkansas stice. (“Democrat-Gazette”), Arkansas Press Association, Associated Press, KFSM-TV, Morning News of Northwest Arkansas, and Northwest Arkansas Times (collectively, “the media”), have petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus-directing respondent, who is Juvenile Judge Stacey Zimmerman, to revoke her gag order on the press entered on May 18, 2000. We agree with petitioners that the gag order is too broad, and because of its breadth, constitutes a prior restraint on the press. We grant a writ of certiorari and direct Judge Zimmerman to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Ivy v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. CollierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Manila School District No. 15 v. WagnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Parker v. CrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API