Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Mutual Fire Insurance v. Carmen Holding Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 3, 1966PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAREY, Justice.

The defendant below (Metropolitan) has appealed from a judgment of the Superior Court, and the plaintiff below (Carmen) has filed a cross-appeal. The case was tried without a jury. The question raised by the appeal is whether the trial Court erred in finding that there was a constructive total loss of a building caused by fire. The point raised in the cross-appeal is whether Carmen is entitled, as a matter of law, to ante-judgment interest on the principal sum due it.

Metropolitan issued a fire insurance policy to Carmen in the amount of $7000 upon a building at Front and West…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. J. Purdy Cope Hotels Co. v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Brennan v. BlackSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
  3. Nelson v. MurraySupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  4. E. M. Fleischmann Lumber Corp. v. Resources Corp. InternationalDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1953
  5. Superior Tube Co. v. Delaware Aircraft Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Moskowitz v. Mayor & Council of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  2. Summa Corp. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. Chaplake Holdings, Ltd.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  4. Brandywine Smyrna, Inc. v. Millennium Builders, LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. WSMW Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API