Metropolitan Mutual Fire Insurance v. Carmen Holding Co.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
CAREY, Justice.
The defendant below (Metropolitan) has appealed from a judgment of the Superior Court, and the plaintiff below (Carmen) has filed a cross-appeal. The case was tried without a jury. The question raised by the appeal is whether the trial Court erred in finding that there was a constructive total loss of a building caused by fire. The point raised in the cross-appeal is whether Carmen is entitled, as a matter of law, to ante-judgment interest on the principal sum due it.
Metropolitan issued a fire insurance policy to Carmen in the amount of $7000 upon a building at Front and West…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- J. Purdy Cope Hotels Co. v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Brennan v. BlackSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
- Nelson v. MurraySupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- E. M. Fleischmann Lumber Corp. v. Resources Corp. InternationalDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1953
- Superior Tube Co. v. Delaware Aircraft Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Moskowitz v. Mayor & Council of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
- Summa Corp. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Chrysler Corp. v. Chaplake Holdings, Ltd.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- Brandywine Smyrna, Inc. v. Millennium Builders, LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. WSMW Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.