State v. Brabson
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION ON APPELLEE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Opinion of the Court · McCORMICKMcCORMICK, Presiding Judge
KELLER, PRICE, HOLLAND and WOMACK, Judges, joined.
In this case, we must decide whether the Dallas County District Attorney is collaterally estopped from litigating at a motion to suppress hearing in a criminal prosecution the issue of probable cause for appellee’s arrest when the Texas Department of Public Safety has received an adverse ruling on that issue in a prior administrative proceeding to revoke appellee’s driver’s license. We hold the Dallas County District Attorney is not collaterally estopped from litigating the issue of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by108 opinions
- Saldano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Gallups v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Doan, Ex Parte DustinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Arthur v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.