Pitcairn v. Harkness
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment and order denying a new trial. The action was one to determine conflicting claims to a certain twenty-five foot strip of-ground lying between tracts of land owned by the respective parties. Plaintiff in her complaint alleged exclusive ownership and right of possession thereto, which was denied by the answer, and defendant, in addition, filed a cross-complaint in which he claimed the exclusive ownership and right of possession as against plaintiff.
The court found that plaintiff was the owner and entitled to such possession, and that defendant had no right or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sears v. AckermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Myers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Moakley v. Los Angeles Pacific Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Goodfellow v. BarrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Kraemer v. KraemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.