Legal Opinion

State v. Bernard

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 31, 1995No. 33608-8-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

Jason R. Bernard stopped for a customs spection at the Blaine border crossing with three pounds ‘ ephedrine, a chemical used to manufacture metham phetamine, hidden in his car. He had purchased the ephedrine in Canada and intended to deliver it to his partner in Washington for ultimate sale in Oregon. Customs agents searched Bernard’s car and seized the ephedrine. The Whatcom County prosecutor charged Bernard with the unlawful receipt of a precursor drug, contrary to RCW 69.43.070(2). At a bench trial, the court found Bernard guilty as charged. Bernard appeals. Because we conclude that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Allingham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. FjermestadWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BourneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  2. State v. McCollumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  3. Tobin v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Tobin v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. State v. CalderaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API