Tobin v. Department of Labor & Industries
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.
¶1 The Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) appeals the superior court’s finding that L&I cannot seek reimbursement from the portion of Jim A. Tobin’s third party recovery compensating him for his pain and suffering following a work-related injury that he sustained when a crane boom crushed him. L&I argues that the statutory reimbursement use of the term “recovery” includes “all damages except loss of consortium” and that it is entitled to seek reimbursement from the pain and suffering portion of Tobin’s damages. We hold that, because L&I did not, and will not, pay pain and suffering…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tobin v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Tobin v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Boeing Co. v. DossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Ronald v. Ma'ae, V State Of Wa Dept Of Labor And IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Jones v. City of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.