Legal Opinion

Kapa Associates v. Flores

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided May 14, 1979No. File SP-H-7903-745-HDPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpada, J.

The plaintiff landlord seeks possession of an apartment dwelling unit by way of a summary process complaint which alleges a termination of lease and the commission of a nuisance. The defendant’s status is that of a tenant on an oral month-to-month lease. A motion to dismiss was filed contending that the complaint failed to meet the requirements of § 47a-15 1 of the General Statutes.

The issue raised by the present motion is one of first impression within Connecticut. No published decisions related to this issue have been found. Essentially, the tenant seeks a “second bite of the apple.” She…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hurlbut v. LemelinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  2. Webb v. AmblerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. Colli v. Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  4. Cicala v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Vogel v. BacusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Jefferson Garden Associates v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. United Hospital Center, Inc. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  3. Windsor Properties, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1979
  4. Marrinan v. HamerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  5. HOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF NEW HAVEN v. DeRocheConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API