Legal Opinion

Bache v. Great Lakes Insurance Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1929No. 21530. Department TwoPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

By these four actions, consolidated for the purpose of trial in the superior court, and also for the purpose of disposition upon appeal in this court, the plaintiffs, Bache and wife, seek recovery upon four fire insurance policies, issued one by each of the four defendant insurance companies. Trial upon the merits in the superior court, sitting without a jury, resulted in findings and judgments awarding to Bache and wife recovery upon each of the policies for the full amount thereof, from which each of the insurance companies has appealed to this court.

The facts are but little in dispute, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. North River InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Hughes v. Eastern Railway & Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Finley v. Western Empire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Tacoma Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Violette v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Glens Falls Insurance v. Founders' InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. MFA Mutual Insurance Co. v. Southwest Baptist College, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Taxter v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. Baysdon v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Copley v. Pekin Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API