Legal Opinion

Copley v. Pekin Insurance Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1986No. 61642PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

On December 15, 1981, fire destroyed an appliance business owned by Joel Copley in Farmer City. Pekin Insurance Company, to which Copley had paid an annual insurance premium in August 1981, denied Copley’s claim for the loss. Pekin maintained that, under the doctrine of cancellation by substitution, Copley’s policy with Pekin was no longer in effect at the time of the fire. Pekin asserted that Copley had purchased a new insurance policy on his appliance business from Federated Mutual Insurance Company, that he had intended to cancel the Pekin policy, and that he had communicated this intent…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Glens Falls Insurance v. Founders' InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Songer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. M. Arnfeld & Son v. Guardian Assurance Co. of LondonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Baysdon v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Larsen v. Thuringia American InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Illinois Armored Car Corp. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Country Mutual Insurance v. Teachers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Innovative Modular Solutions v. Hazel Crest School District 152.5Illinois Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Jadczak v. MODERN SERVICE INSUR. CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Nagel v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API