Witter v. Taylor
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the St. Joseph Court'of Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.
Taylor, assignee of Doming, sued Witter and Miller, partners, &c., on a promissory note. Trial by the Court. Finding and judgment for the plaintiff for 633 dollars.
During the progress of the cause, an exception was taken to the opinion of the Court in overruling a motion for a change of venue.
Witter, one of the defendants, filed an affidavit to the effect that judge Egbert, before whom the action was pending in the Common Pleas, had been engaged as counsel for the plaintiff in the cause, as law partner of W. G. George, the plaintiff’s attorney of record; and that therefore he believed that…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by17 opinions
- People v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Burkett v. HolmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Blackwell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- Krutz v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Lincoln v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.