In Re Henry

An information charged petitioner and three codefendants, Jenkins, Whitfield, and Hill, with attempted armed robbery of Chester Gambucci and with assault upon him with' a deadly weapon. A jury found petitioner guilty as charged. The trial court imposed concurrent sentences for the two offenses.

Petitioner contends that the concurrent sentences inflict multiple punishment in violation of Penal Code section 654, 2 and invokes the rule of Neal v. State of California (1960) 55 Cal.2d 11, 19 [9 Cal.Rptr. 607, 357 P.2d 839], that “If all of the offenses were incident to one objective, the defendant…