Legal Opinion
United States of America v. James Truesdale Ronald Hamilton
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 5, 2000No. 99-10096PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Chief Judge:
Defendants-Appellants James Truesdale and Ronald Hamilton appeal from the district court’s denial of their joint application for reimbursement of attorney’s fees. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This case revisits the story of an offshore sports wagering enterprise that is well-chronicled in one of our previous opinions. See United States v. Truesdale, 152 F.3d 443 (5th Cir.1998). Defendants-Appellants James Truesdale and Ronald Hamilton (“Appellants”), along with two others, were indicted and tried on multiple charges, including conspiracy, money laundering,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Harrods Limited v. Sixty Internet Domain NamesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Anthony P. Perry v. Tryllous Hossler, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Steven B. AisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- In Re Special Grand Jury 89-2Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. SherburneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.