Legal Opinion

In Re Special Grand Jury 89-2

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 15, 2006No. 04-1193, 04-1215PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) prohibits grand jurors, court reporters, government attorneys,- and others from disclosing “a matter occurring before the grand jury.” The rule contains several exceptions authorizing disclosure to certain government attorneys and other government officials in specified circumstances, and permitting a court to authorize disclosure in other limited circumstances. Appellants were members of a federal grand jury empaneled in 1989 to investigate possible environmental crimes at the Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Plant ■ (Rocky Flats) in…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Leonard Cottrell v. Alcon LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Carpenter v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. San Juan County, Utah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. PickardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API