Legal Opinion

Fussell v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 2010No. 369A09PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMUNDS, Justice.

In this case we consider whether plaintiffs’ allegations of negligence against defendant Town of Apex (“defendant” or “Apex”) adequately pleaded the element that defendant owed plaintiffs a duty of care. The complaint alleges that plaintiffs’ property was damaged by flooding that resulted when, in response to a telephone call requesting that the water be turned on at the residence on the property, an agent or employee of Apex knocked on plaintiffs’ doors and, receiving no answer, nevertheless turned on the water and left after confirming that the water meter was running. We…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Meyer v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Stein v. Asheville City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Council v. Dickerson's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Turner v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Fussell v. FARM BUREAU MUT. INS. CO.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  3. Best Cartage, Inc. v. Stonewall Packaging, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Doe v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
  5. Davis v. Hulsing Enters., LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API