Legal Opinion

Stein v. Asheville City Board of Education

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 2006No. 128A05PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWBY, Justice.

The issue is whether plaintiffs have stated a claim for negligence against defendant Blue Ridge Area Authority 1 (“defendant”) for damages resulting from the off-campus shooting of plaintiff Stein by students who attended defendant’s school. We hold plaintiffs have not stated a valid claim, and we reverse the Court of Appeals.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Kathlyn Marie Stein (“Stein”) and husband plaintiff Michael Hootstein filed suit against defendant alleging the following facts. 2 Defendant is a political subdivision of the State, organized under N.C.G.S. § 122C-101 through -200, 3…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Wood v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Nelson v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint VentureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Hart v. IveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Krawiec v. ManlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  2. State v. Ridgeway Brands Manufacturing, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Strickland v. HedrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Maria Durden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  5. Bridges v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2013

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API