Stein v. Asheville City Board of Education
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
NEWBY, Justice.
The issue is whether plaintiffs have stated a claim for negligence against defendant Blue Ridge Area Authority 1 (“defendant”) for damages resulting from the off-campus shooting of plaintiff Stein by students who attended defendant’s school. We hold plaintiffs have not stated a valid claim, and we reverse the Court of Appeals.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Kathlyn Marie Stein (“Stein”) and husband plaintiff Michael Hootstein filed suit against defendant alleging the following facts. 2 Defendant is a political subdivision of the State, organized under N.C.G.S. § 122C-101 through -200, 3…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Wood v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Nelson v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint VentureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Hart v. IveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Krawiec v. ManlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. Ridgeway Brands Manufacturing, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- Strickland v. HedrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Maria Durden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Bridges v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.