Legal Opinion
Seymour v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1893No. 891PublishedCited by 44 opinions
Apxjeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Stiles, J.
The appellant sought to enjoin the holding of an election in the city of Tacoma, looking to carrying-out the scheme which is set forth in the following ordinance:
“Ordinance fío. 790.
“An ordinance to provide for the purchase of the waterworks and electric light plant, and all such water supplies, riparian rights, rights-of-way, lands, lots, personal property and franchises as are now owned or operated by the Tacoma Light and AVater Company as part of such water and electric light plants, excepting their distributing system in the town of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Metcalfe v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Hoffheins v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
3Cited by44 opinions
- State ex rel. Webster v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Uhler v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Northern Cedar Co. v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Holzman v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Griffin v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1908
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.