Legal Opinion

Seymour v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1893No. 891PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Apxjeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

The appellant sought to enjoin the holding of an election in the city of Tacoma, looking to carrying-out the scheme which is set forth in the following ordinance:

“Ordinance fío. 790.
“An ordinance to provide for the purchase of the waterworks and electric light plant, and all such water supplies, riparian rights, rights-of-way, lands, lots, personal property and franchises as are now owned or operated by the Tacoma Light and AVater Company as part of such water and electric light plants, excepting their distributing system in the town of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Metcalfe v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hoffheins v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Webster v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Uhler v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Northern Cedar Co. v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Holzman v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Griffin v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1908

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API