Hoffheins v. Russell
Supreme Court of the United States
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatcheobd
This suit is brought for the infringement of two reissued letters-patent granted to Reuben Hoffheins, the appellant. One, No. 2224, was issued April 10, 1866, for an “ improvement in harvesters,” the original patent, No. 35,315, having been issued to him May 20, 1862. The other, No. 2490, was issued Feb. 19, 1867, for an “ improvement in harvesters,” the original patent, No. 40,481, having been issued to him Nov. 3,1863, and reissued in two divisions, one, No. 1888, Feb. 28, 1865, and the other. No. 2102, Nov. 7, 1865, and No. 2490 having been issued on the surrender of No. 2102.
No. 2224…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Seymour v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- United States v. Jay Scott BallingerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- In Re FranzeseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2008
- Milwaukee Carving Co. v. Brunswick-Balke Collender Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.