Legal Opinion

Metcalfe v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1890No. 76PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Appeal from Superior Oourt, King County. Injunction against defendants, as mayor and finance committee of the common council of the city of Seattle, to restrain them from selling or otherwise disposing of bonds theretofore issued, in the sum of $955,000, under ordinance No. 1343, of said city, for the purchase of water-works, and the construction of a sewerage system.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Superior Oourt, King County. Injunction against defendants, as mayor and finance committee of the common council of the city of Seattle, to restrain them from selling or otherwise disposing of bonds theretofore issued, in the sum of $955,000, under ordinance No. 1343, of said city, for the purchase of water-works, and the construction of a sewerage system. In pursuance of notice, a special election was held in the city of Seattle, on the 4th day of June, 1890, .for the purpose of voting upon the proposed issuance of bonds for that purpose. The whole number of voters who voted at…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

This was an amicable suit brought to obtain the court’s construction of ?¿ 6, article 8 of the constitution, and the legislation had thereunder, resulting in the act of February 26, 1890 (Session Laws, p. 225), and the act of March 26, 1890 (Session Laws, p. 520), as applied to the city of Seattle, which was proposing to issue certain bonds for a water and sewerage system, amounting to $955,000. The controversy, however, was a real one, and under the pleadings fairly brought to this court two questions for answer, viz.: 1. Can a municipal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carroll County v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. County of Cass v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. St. Joseph Township v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Hawkins v. Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Southerland v. Board of Aldermen of GoldsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Seymour v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Seymour v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. City of Denver v. HayesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  4. Langdon v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Avery v. JobOregon Supreme Court · 1894

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API