Legal Opinion

Lusk v. Krejci

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1960No. Civ. 19349PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, J.

In this action plaintiffs Lusk sought a mandatory injunction directing defendants Krejci to remove an encroachment from their property. From the judgment directing removal defendants appeal.

There is no dispute as to the physical facts. The parties own adjacent lots located on Terrace Drive in Los Altos. The respondents’ ownership has existed since 1952, the appellants’ since 1957. In August of 1954 respondents had a contractor build a concrete block wall; the wall is entirely upon respondents’ property, running from front to rear for a distance of approximately 100 feet, along the boundary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Florez v. Groom Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Christensen v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Stoner v. ZuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Clapp v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. O'CONNELL v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Richardson v. FrancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Protopappas v. ProtopappasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Kirkegaard v. McLainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Shoen v. Zacarias, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API