Legal Opinion
Rosenthal v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 21, 2006No. Civil Action 3:05CV478 (JCH)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[Doc. Nos. 102 & 104]
HALL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiffs, Marjorie Rosenthal, individually and as executrix of the Estate of Amal Murarka, Sumeet Murarka, and Pamela Murarka, have asserted numerous claims against defendants Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLC (“BFNT”), and BFS Retail & Commercial Operations, LLC (“BFRC”) d/b/a Firestone Tire and Service Center. 1 The claims arise from a one-car automobile accident that occurred when a Firestone tire tread separated and caused a 1995 Ford…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Jose GOENAGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARCH OF DIMES BIRTH DEFECTS FOUNDATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Aviles v. Wayside Auto Body, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Fraiser v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Elvig v. NINTENDO OF AMERICA, INC.District Court, D. Colorado · 2010
- GOLDSICH v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Collazo v. Nutribullet, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.